At the end of the shift, the tractor driver of the RSU Belov arbitrarily used a tractor attached to it with a trailer for transporting goods and citizens. As a result of the accident caused by his fault, the tractor and a private residential building were damaged. RSU, as the owner of a source of increased danger, incurred the costs of repairing a residential building and a tractor with a trailer. In addition, CSF incurred losses in the form of unearned income, since the tractor was not used for its intended purpose for ten days.
Is there any reason for bringing Belov to liability for damage caused by DCS in this situation. If so, in what amount and in what order will the damage be compensated?

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.