Engineering plant workers fired
📂 For Education Students
👤 HotRef
Product Description
The workers of the engineering plant were fired on the following grounds:
1) under paragraph 5 of article 81 shopping mall - the barmaid of the dining room Tkachev. Despite repeated reminders, she did not undergo a medical examination, for which, by order of the head of the canteen, she was suspended from work and reprimanded;
2) under sub. “A” p. 6 art. 81 shopping mall - driver Lysenko. For violation of traffic rules he was deprived of a driver's license for one year. The head of the transport department transferred him to a car mechanic. The driver refused the transfer and did not go to work;
3) under sub. "D" p. 6 of article 81 TK - senior foreman of the construction site of the Tesnoy factory. He systematically violated the rules of the internal work schedule: he refused to pass exams on building codes, labor protection and safety, and on the rules for operating cranes;
4) under sub. “C” paragraph 6 of Art. 81 TK - personnel inspectors Saltykov. She refused to provide the commercial firm with information on the home telephone numbers of the factory workers.
How legal and justified is each dismissal?
1) under paragraph 5 of article 81 shopping mall - the barmaid of the dining room Tkachev. Despite repeated reminders, she did not undergo a medical examination, for which, by order of the head of the canteen, she was suspended from work and reprimanded;
2) under sub. “A” p. 6 art. 81 shopping mall - driver Lysenko. For violation of traffic rules he was deprived of a driver's license for one year. The head of the transport department transferred him to a car mechanic. The driver refused the transfer and did not go to work;
3) under sub. "D" p. 6 of article 81 TK - senior foreman of the construction site of the Tesnoy factory. He systematically violated the rules of the internal work schedule: he refused to pass exams on building codes, labor protection and safety, and on the rules for operating cranes;
4) under sub. “C” paragraph 6 of Art. 81 TK - personnel inspectors Saltykov. She refused to provide the commercial firm with information on the home telephone numbers of the factory workers.
How legal and justified is each dismissal?
Additional Information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Related Products
Solution of the C2 Option 04 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 05 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Dievsky V.A. - Solution of task C2 variant 22 (C2-22)
Seller: Михаил_Перович
Solution K5 B04 termehu of Reshebnik Yablonsky AA 1978
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the K2 version 07 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 14 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 08 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Conflict law test Synergy answers 90/100 points
Seller: sinergey