In connection with the initiation of a criminal case against the entrepreneur Rybin, property that was the common property of the Rybins' spouses was seized.
Rybina’s wife, considering it illegal to include property belonging to her under the terms of the marriage contract, went to court with a lawsuit to exclude from the inventory a furniture set, piano, a collection of rare stamps, a car and a summer residence, believing that the damage caused by her husband should reimbursed only at the expense of his personal property, as expressly indicated in the contract. Rybin showed the contract to the bailiff, but despite this, the property was seized.
The court, having established that Rybin did not have personal property, since it had already been described and sold for debts on civil law obligations six months ago, involved the prosecutor in the case. The public prosecutor asked the marriage contract to be declared invalid in the interests of the state.
Solve the problem.

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.