Department of Capital Construction (UKS) presented
📂 For Education Students
👤 HotRef
Product Description
The Office of Capital Construction (UKS) filed a lawsuit to collect debts for performing work in the Arbitration Court of the region. Having studied the materials presented, the judge on the basis of Art. 150 APC of the Russian Federation refused to accept the statement of claim. He justified his decision by the fact that Art. 28 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation establishes that the arbitration court is subject to disputes only with the participation of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs, and the UKS does not have a certificate of state registration as a legal entity.
Give a reasoned opinion on the decision of the judge.
Option. UKS was established in 1959 by a resolution of the Government of the USSR as a structural unit of the regional executive committee. The Regulation on the UKS does not refer to the fact that it is a legal entity. At the time the lawsuit was filed, UKS had its own bank account, drafted and presented an independent balance sheet to state bodies, had a seal. In addition, the UKS was registered as a taxpayer with the state tax inspectorate, and statistics codes were assigned to it at the regional committee.
Give a reasoned opinion on the decision of the judge.
Option. UKS was established in 1959 by a resolution of the Government of the USSR as a structural unit of the regional executive committee. The Regulation on the UKS does not refer to the fact that it is a legal entity. At the time the lawsuit was filed, UKS had its own bank account, drafted and presented an independent balance sheet to state bodies, had a seal. In addition, the UKS was registered as a taxpayer with the state tax inspectorate, and statistics codes were assigned to it at the regional committee.
Additional Information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Related Products
Solution of the C2 Option 04 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 05 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Dievsky V.A. - Solution of task C2 variant 22 (C2-22)
Seller: Михаил_Перович
Solution K5 B04 termehu of Reshebnik Yablonsky AA 1978
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the K2 version 07 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 14 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 08 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Conflict law test Synergy answers 90/100 points
Seller: sinergey