The subject of natural monopoly turned
📂 For Education Students
👤 HotRef
Product Description
The natural monopoly entity appealed to the arbitration court with a request to invalidate the requirements of the antimonopoly body on concluding an agreement with the consumer in accordance with the quota established by the regulatory body of the natural monopoly, referring to the fact that the activities of natural monopolies are not subject to control by the antimonopoly authorities.
The arbitration court did not agree with the opinion of the subject of natural monopoly and denied the lawsuit. Article 5 of the federal law of March 22, 1991 No. 9488-1 “On Competition and the Limitation of Monopolistic Activities in Commodity Markets” prohibits business entities occupying a dominant position in the market from abusing this provision.
The natural monopoly entity appealed against this court decision, considering that the activities of natural monopoly entities are controlled by state regulatory bodies of natural monopolies and are not subject to prohibitions established by antitrust laws.
Give an opinion on the situation.
The arbitration court did not agree with the opinion of the subject of natural monopoly and denied the lawsuit. Article 5 of the federal law of March 22, 1991 No. 9488-1 “On Competition and the Limitation of Monopolistic Activities in Commodity Markets” prohibits business entities occupying a dominant position in the market from abusing this provision.
The natural monopoly entity appealed against this court decision, considering that the activities of natural monopoly entities are controlled by state regulatory bodies of natural monopolies and are not subject to prohibitions established by antitrust laws.
Give an opinion on the situation.
Additional Information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Related Products
Solution of the C2 Option 04 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 05 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Dievsky V.A. - Solution of task C2 variant 22 (C2-22)
Seller: Михаил_Перович
Solution K5 B04 termehu of Reshebnik Yablonsky AA 1978
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the K2 version 07 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 14 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 08 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Conflict law test Synergy answers 90/100 points
Seller: sinergey