In February 1998, the qualification collegium of judges of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug dismissed the applicant to the European Court of Human Rights, a citizen of the Russian Federation P., a judge of the district court of Noyabrsk and a member of the Zhivaya Vera church from the position of a judge due to abuse of her official position for the implementation of religious activities in the interests of the church.
P. filed a complaint with the Higher Qualification Collegium of Judges of the Russian Federation. In May 1998, the College rejected P.'s complaint, after which she filed a complaint with the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation - the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation acknowledged that the applicant was engaged in church propaganda and religious intimidation of the parties in the process by which she was appointed judge.
Have the applicant exhausted all domestic remedies, as required by paragraph 1 of Art. 35 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms? Was there a case, according to the applicant, of a violation of Art. 9, 10 and 14 of the Convention?

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.