Ivanova lived as a tenant in a one-room apartment in the house, which was subsequently included in the service as previously owned by the state farm.
Wanting to exchange the apartment for another living quarters, Ivanova turned to the administration of the state farm with a request to allow such an exchange, which she was denied. The district court, where she applied, refused the lawsuit on the exchange.
In a cassation appeal, Ivanova asks to cancel the decision, indicating that she received housing not in connection with her work at the state farm, but during her work as a cleaner in high school. Questions to the task
Is the case resolved correctly?

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.