Tishchenko filed a lawsuit against Zhigalin for recognition of her ownership of 1/2 of the house acquired by the parties while in actual marriage. The reason for suing was the fact that Zhigalin deprived the plaintiff of the opportunity to live in the house.
The court refused Tishchenko's lawsuit on the grounds that the parties are not married, the plaintiff never worked, the house was purchased entirely at the expense of Zhigalin. “However, there is no reason to consider,” the decision stated, “Tishchenko has no right to use the living space in it.”
The court recognized Tishchenko's right to use one of the three rooms in the house.
Is the decision of the district court lawful?

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.