At the hearing of the case on Galkin’s lawsuit against Larin regarding the recognition of ownership of a part of the house, the representative of the defendant presented written evidence that had not previously been presented to the court, and their copies were not sent to the plaintiff.
The representative of the plaintiff filed a motion to adjourn the proceedings in order to familiarize themselves with the evidence presented and prepare reasoned objections. The court rejected the request for adjournment, declaring instead a one-hour break.
During the break, the court resolved the case on Antipova’s lawsuit against Antipov on divorce and made a decision. At the end of the break, the court, without taking into account the views of the parties, continued the trial of the first case.
Are any principles of civil procedure violated?

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.