After the dissolution of the marriage, Ryaposova continued to live with her ex-husband as one family and maintain a common household. During this period, they purchased a car for 200,000 rubles for shared use, to which she transferred 100,000 rubles from personal savings.
After the death of the former spouse, his son from his first marriage, having drawn up the right of inheritance, refused to pay her compensation for a share in the cost of the car. Ryaposova appealed to him with a lawsuit.
By a court decision, the lawsuit was denied in connection with the missing deadline for filing claims against the defendant who accepted the inheritance. Ryaposova appealed against the court ruling.
Are court actions lawful? What decision should the second instance court make? Draw up an appropriate procedural document.

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2004-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.