Lozhkina sued Lozhkin for divorce, the division of jointly acquired property and the recovery of alimony for a minor son. In the process of considering the case, the mother of the defendant Lozhkina appealed to the court with a request for recognition of her ownership of the upholstered furniture, which she claimed was transferred to the spouses for free use.
Questions:
1. Guided by Article 24 SK RF and Art. 151 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, determine which requirements in this dispute can be considered together, and which separately and why?
2. Who has the right to connect and disconnect several claims?
3. What requirements does the court have the right to resolve on its own initiative, ie to go beyond the limits claimed by the plaintiff Lozhkina? Justify your conclusion by referring to the relevant norms of substantive and procedural law.

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2004-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.