Limited Liability Company "Kvant"
📂 For Education Students
👤 HotRef
Product Description
The Kvant limited liability company (tenant) filed a claim with the court of arbitration against Caesar CJSC (subtenant) about evicting it from the occupied premises.
The court found that the city property management committee (the landlord) concluded in 2000 a contract for the lease of non-residential premises for a period of 10 years with OJSC Polyanka (the former tenant). In 2004, with the consent of the committee (lessor), OJSC Polyanka, one of the leased premises, Cesar CJSC (the respondent in this case) was sublet for 5 years. In 2005, the city property management committee, Polyanka OJSC, Kvant LLC (plaintiff) signed an agreement, in accordance with which Polyanka OJSC transferred its rights and obligations under the lease agreement to the renewal of Kvant LLC. The latter committed to overhaul and renovate the entire building at its own expense. The new tenant (the plaintiff of Kvant LLC) believed that since the conclusion of the above contract, the sublease contract with Caesar CJSC was terminated, since the rights and obligations of the tenant were transferred by the former tenant in the order of renegotiation, and not as a result of a new contract with the owner of the premises.
Solve the case.
The court found that the city property management committee (the landlord) concluded in 2000 a contract for the lease of non-residential premises for a period of 10 years with OJSC Polyanka (the former tenant). In 2004, with the consent of the committee (lessor), OJSC Polyanka, one of the leased premises, Cesar CJSC (the respondent in this case) was sublet for 5 years. In 2005, the city property management committee, Polyanka OJSC, Kvant LLC (plaintiff) signed an agreement, in accordance with which Polyanka OJSC transferred its rights and obligations under the lease agreement to the renewal of Kvant LLC. The latter committed to overhaul and renovate the entire building at its own expense. The new tenant (the plaintiff of Kvant LLC) believed that since the conclusion of the above contract, the sublease contract with Caesar CJSC was terminated, since the rights and obligations of the tenant were transferred by the former tenant in the order of renegotiation, and not as a result of a new contract with the owner of the premises.
Solve the case.
Additional Information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Related Products
Solution of the C2 Option 04 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 05 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Dievsky V.A. - Solution of task C2 variant 22 (C2-22)
Seller: Михаил_Перович
Solution K5 B04 termehu of Reshebnik Yablonsky AA 1978
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the K2 version 07 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 14 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 08 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Conflict law test Synergy answers 90/100 points
Seller: sinergey