Elderly Sushkova, a disabled person of group I vision
📂 For Education Students
👤 HotRef
Product Description
Elderly Sushkova, a disabled person of the first vision group, at her request, an assistant Medvedkova was appointed by the department of social protection of the local administration. After some time, on the basis of paragraph 1 of Art. 1026 of the Civil Code, the social protection department concluded an agreement with Medvedkova on trust management of Sushkova’s property and certified it notarially.
When Sushkova was in the hospital, Medvedkova sold her three-room apartment, and in her name bought a room in a communal apartment. Sushkova filed a claim for recognition of the sale and purchase transaction as invalid, recognition of her ownership of the apartment and compensation for damages to Medvedkova and the Registration Chamber, which registered the apartment sale transaction. She motivated her actions by not giving anyone a power of attorney to sell the apartment.
Medvedkova claim not recognized. In her opinion, the contract of trust management indicated that she, as a manager, could make any transactions with Sushkova's property. The expediency of this transaction is beyond doubt, because Sushkova repeatedly complained about the lack of pensions about the maintenance of her property, and after selling the apartment her expenses should be drastically reduced. The Registration Chamber did not recognize the claim either.
Analyze the arguments of the parties and decide the case.
When Sushkova was in the hospital, Medvedkova sold her three-room apartment, and in her name bought a room in a communal apartment. Sushkova filed a claim for recognition of the sale and purchase transaction as invalid, recognition of her ownership of the apartment and compensation for damages to Medvedkova and the Registration Chamber, which registered the apartment sale transaction. She motivated her actions by not giving anyone a power of attorney to sell the apartment.
Medvedkova claim not recognized. In her opinion, the contract of trust management indicated that she, as a manager, could make any transactions with Sushkova's property. The expediency of this transaction is beyond doubt, because Sushkova repeatedly complained about the lack of pensions about the maintenance of her property, and after selling the apartment her expenses should be drastically reduced. The Registration Chamber did not recognize the claim either.
Analyze the arguments of the parties and decide the case.
Additional Information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Related Products
Solution of the C2 Option 04 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 05 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Dievsky V.A. - Solution of task C2 variant 22 (C2-22)
Seller: Михаил_Перович
Solution K5 B04 termehu of Reshebnik Yablonsky AA 1978
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the K2 version 07 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 14 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 08 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Conflict law test Synergy answers 90/100 points
Seller: sinergey