684/5000
Prokuror obratilsya v sud s zayavleniyem o priznanii Kirillova ogranichenno deyesposobnym. V zayavlenii otmechalos', chto odinokiy Kirillov prozhivaya v komnate kommunal'noy kvartiry, zloupotreblyayet spirtnymi napitkami, narushayet pokoy sosedey, kotoryye obratilis' v prokuraturu s pros'boy prinyat' v otnoshenii Kirillova neobkhodimyye mery. K zayavleniyu prokurora byla prilozhena spravka psikhonevrologicheskogo dispansera, v kotoroy bylo skazano, chto Kirillov – khronicheskiy alkogolik i nuzhdayetsya v ogranichenii deyesposobnosti. Narodnyy sud vynes resheniye o priznanii Kirillova ogranichenno deyesposobnym.
Pravil'no li resheniye narodnogo suda? Izmenit'sya li resheniye, yesli Kirillov soderzhal prestareluyu mat'?
The prosecutor appealed to the court for recognition of Kirillov as partially capable. The statement noted that a lonely Kirillov living in a room in a communal apartment was abusing alcohol, disturbing the peace of neighbors, who appealed to the prosecutor’s office to take the necessary measures against Kirillov. A statement from the psycho-neurological dispensary was attached to the prosecutor’s statement, in which it was said that Kirillov was a chronic alcoholic and was in need of disability. The people's court issued a decision recognizing Kirillov as partially capable.
Is the decision of the people's court correct? Does the decision change if Kirillov contained an elderly mother?

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.