Joint-stock company "Borsky glass factory"
📂 For Education Students
👤 HotRef
Product Description
Joint Stock Company Borsky Glass Works appealed to the Arbitration Court of the city of Moscow with a claim to the production company Alfa LTD for the recovery of 220,000 rubles, which constitute the cost of four unreturned containers out of glass products according to the certificate 3.
From the case file it is clear that the Arbitration Court considered the case of paying a fine for late return of the cost of containers. The court also considers that Article 401 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is applicable to the legal relations of the parties. The deadline for returning containers under certificate 3 was March 9, 1993, before the introduction of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The court also considers that in the absence of a contract, the claimant is entitled to demand only the return of the containers in kind.
According to Article 133 of the Fundamentals of Civil Legislation of the USSR and the Republics, if it is impossible to return in kind the unjustifiably received property to the injured person, its value must be reimbursed. Other documents in the case file is not available.
Your opinion on this situation. Whether the claim is subject to satisfaction. Find the contradictions in the problem. Highlight problems. Solve the case. Use also the APC RF.
From the case file it is clear that the Arbitration Court considered the case of paying a fine for late return of the cost of containers. The court also considers that Article 401 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is applicable to the legal relations of the parties. The deadline for returning containers under certificate 3 was March 9, 1993, before the introduction of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The court also considers that in the absence of a contract, the claimant is entitled to demand only the return of the containers in kind.
According to Article 133 of the Fundamentals of Civil Legislation of the USSR and the Republics, if it is impossible to return in kind the unjustifiably received property to the injured person, its value must be reimbursed. Other documents in the case file is not available.
Your opinion on this situation. Whether the claim is subject to satisfaction. Find the contradictions in the problem. Highlight problems. Solve the case. Use also the APC RF.
Additional Information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Related Products
Solution of the C2 Option 04 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 05 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Dievsky V.A. - Solution of task C2 variant 22 (C2-22)
Seller: Михаил_Перович
Solution K5 B04 termehu of Reshebnik Yablonsky AA 1978
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the K2 version 07 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 14 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the C2 Option 08 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Conflict law test Synergy answers 90/100 points
Seller: sinergey